compiseverythng (![[info]](http://l-stat.livejournal.com/img/userinfo.gif){kind=small} compiseverythng) wrote,@ 2005-11-21 07:45:00 |
|
Inseparability
Finally chapter six again. RR argues for an ontological breakdown into eight possibilities of three things, thoughts, physical processes, and computations. This is fine and useful if you accept a plural nature of things. But I find myself in that other camp I described early in this blog. Namely that don’t think there is a plural nature to things. Separation is an illusion, Maya. It is a bit like Rudy’s 1. Universal automatism, Every object or thought is a computation but the line holding it disappears.
Finally chapter six again. RR argues for an ontological breakdown into eight possibilities of three things, thoughts, physical processes, and computations. This is fine and useful if you accept a plural nature of things. But I find myself in that other camp I described early in this blog. Namely that don’t think there is a plural nature to things. Separation is an illusion, Maya. It is a bit like Rudy’s 1. Universal automatism, Every object or thought is a computation but the line holding it disappears.
